Same Bible, different foundation

How the KJV compares to modern translations

Most disagreements between the KJV and contemporary versions are not about English style — they trace back to a different underlying Greek text. Here is exactly where, and why it matters.

Textual basis and translation philosophy

VersionFirst publishedTextual basisPhilosophy
King James Version1611 (std. 1769)Received Text (Textus Receptus)Formal, word-for-word
New American Standard Bible1971 (rev. 1995, 2020)Critical Text (Nestle-Aland / UBS)Formal, word-for-word
English Standard Version2001 (rev. 2016)Critical Text (Nestle-Aland / UBS)"Essentially literal"
New International Version1978 (rev. 1984, 2011)Critical Text (Nestle-Aland / UBS)Dynamic (thought-for-thought)
New Living Translation1996 (rev. 2004, 2015)Critical Text (Nestle-Aland / UBS)Dynamic (thought-for-thought)

Every version above except the KJV shares essentially the same critical Greek text as its New Testament basis, which is why they tend to agree with each other — and diverge from the KJV — in the same places. The reasoning behind the KJV’s different textual basis is explained on the Textus Receptus page.

Disputed passages, verse by verse

These are among the most-cited, best-documented differences. In each case the KJV includes wording that modern critical-text versions omit, bracket, or footnote as textually uncertain.

PassageKJV readingModern critical-text readingWhat’s at stake
1 John 5:7–8Includes the explicit Trinitarian statement: "there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost."Shortened to "there are three that testify," with the Trinitarian clause omitted or moved to a footnote.The clearest single verse explicitly naming Father, Word, and Spirit together.
Mark 16:9–20Prints the full longer ending, including the resurrection appearances and the Great Commission.Retained but bracketed, italicized, or footnoted as absent from the two oldest manuscripts.Twelve verses of resurrection testimony and the closing commission.
John 7:53–8:11Includes the account of the woman taken in adultery in full.Retained but bracketed or footnoted as a later addition.A well-known account of Christ’s mercy and authority to forgive sin.
Acts 8:37Includes the eunuch’s confession: "I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God."Omitted from the main text or moved to a footnote.An explicit, pre-baptismal confession of Christ’s deity.
1 Timothy 3:16Reads "God was manifest in the flesh."Reads "He was manifest in the flesh" or similar, following a manuscript reading of "who/he" rather than "God."A direct textual statement of the incarnation and deity of Christ.

Why this matters more than style

Word-choice differences between translations are ordinary and expected. What KJV-only believers find significant is that the differences above are not simply stylistic — they are places where a translation either includes or excludes actual wording, often touching directly on the deity of Christ or the doctrine of the Trinity. The full theological case is laid out on the Why KJV page.

A note on tone: this comparison aims to document real, verifiable textual differences, not to question the sincerity or salvation of believers who read other translations. Many faithful Christians read the NIV, ESV, NASB, or NLT. This page explains why KJV-only believers make a different choice.